The Nanfang / Blog

Chinese Court Orders Compensation for Doctor Threatened with Violence by Patient’s Husband

Posted: 12/17/2014 8:00 am

In dealing with death, some are more level-headed than others, and China has a reputation for being harsh with its medical practitioners after perceived mistreatment. Take the guy who stabbed the first doctor he laid eyes on after being denied treatment, or the horrific beating of a Hunan doctor that led to strikes by medical staff. However, there is no precedent for charging patients with a crime if they simply threaten or defame doctors, then turn out to be wrong – until now.

As meager as it may be, Bao’an District Court’s order for a patient to pay RMB 500 and submit a written apology to a doctor marks the first time a patient has been charged under a law enacted nationally in April that requires patients to pay for unjustly “disrupting normal order” at medical facilities.

On September 3rd, a woman surnamed Liu was found dead at her home in the Shajing area of Bao’an District. Her husband, surnamed Chen, insisted that it was the fault of a clinic where she had been treated. He demanded 3 million yuan in compensation from the clinic, which denied responsibility.

Two days later, Chen led a mob to block the clinic’s gate and held a funeral in front of it. He also threatened a doctor surnamed Jiang, who was too scared to go to work, thereby causing more people to suffer because he couldn’t see his patients.

The coroner’s report, released two weeks after the doctor was forced to shut down his clinic, found that she had ingested liquids that were corrosive to her digestive tract, essentially dying by poisoning. But it wasn’t the medication that she received from the doctor that caused the corrosion.

Meanwhile, the doctor’s father had been so stressed out by the incident that he had to be hospitalized, with Shenzhen Economic Daily reporting that he went into a coma.

Now the doctor says he has lost money from having to shut down the clinic, pay for his father’s stress induced treatment, which he says will cost RMB 700,000, and pay RMB 2,200 in legal fees.

So while the fine the grieving husband received may represent a step in the right direction for behaving in a counterproductive way and blocking others from receiving treatment, it’s actually only symbolic and the doctor still loses in this case. It’s no wonder the Chinese Hospital Association reports that 78 percent of doctors in the country don’t want their children to carry on the profession and 40 percent are considering changing professions.

Haohao

Shenzhen Metro Found Liable in Death of Woman Who Collapsed and Was Ignored

Posted: 12/2/2014 10:04 am

It looks like there may be some justice in Shenzhen after all. The Shenzhen metro has been found partially liable after a woman collapsed in the station and laid there for almost an hour before help arrived.

We told you the story back in February:

A 35-year old employee of IBM in Shenzhen was near Exit C of Shui Wan Station on the Shekou Line on February 17 when she passed out and collapsed, falling on some stairs. The woman eventually signalled for help, according to surveillance video, but nobody did. She moved in and out of consciousness, injured on the stairs, for almost an hour before medical personnel arrived.

Futian District Court ruled last Wednesday that Shenzhen Metro Company should be held partially responsible for the death of the manager, and was ordered to pay RMB 310,000, 30 percent of what the family was asking for as compensation.

The woman, named Liang, 35, laid motionless on the stairs for several minutes after she collapsed. Several people initially passed by her without stopping to help, but three minutes after her fall a woman stopped and notified Metro employees on duty.

An investigation by the court confirmed that Metro employees stood near Liang without examining her for nine minutes before calling police and 15 minutes before calling an ambulance. This was beyond the reasonable limit for safety and security, the court said.

Although Metro employees are trained in first aid, the ones in question claimed they hadn’t administered it because Liang didn’t respond to their shouts, meaning that in either an epic bout of incompetence or shirking of responsibility, they treated her unconscious state as a sign that she didn’t need their immediate help.

Forty-nine minutes after she passed out, ambulances finally arrived and she was pronounced dead at the scene without any emergency measures being taken.

Liang’s parents took Shenzhen Metro Company and Shenzhen First Aid Center to court, the latter of which was found not guilty.

The court’s verdict said that operators in train stations, banks, department stores, hotels and other “public areas” should bear responsibility in terms of providing aid after accidents to people who are on their premises.

Haohao

Shenzhen Isn’t Lining Up to Become a World Class City

Posted: 11/22/2014 4:55 pm

Those who commute using the Shenzhen Metro have heard them so often that they could probably recite them all from memory: the succinct requests for orderliness. “Disembarking precedes embarking” and “please hold the handrail and stand on the right when using the escalator.” But how often do people actually follow these rules?

On a recent Friday afternoon between one and two o’clock (observations were purposely made during non-peak hours) at Grand Theatre station in Luohu District, approximately 80 percent of passengers boarding trains did not wait for disembarking passengers, instead surging ahead at the same time as passengers tried to exit the train. People bumped into each other, pushed and shoved and did whatever it took – but with people moving in both directions in a small space at the same time, it seems like there was no way to proceed that didn’t involve these types of behavior.

“People don’t want to wait for others. They just want to worry about themselves,” Lin said. “When the train comes they just go. They do not think about the message telling them to wait.”

This is common in Shenzhen and in many other parts of China, and not just on the metro. On buses, elevators, escalators and more, people often push and shove, board before people can exit, and generally cause a ruckus despite having ample time to proceed in an orderly fashion.

On that same Friday afternoon at around four o’clock at Happiness Mansion apartment complex in Luohu District, eight out of ten times an elevator arrived at the ground floor, people tried to enter before people had exited. Some who were having a hard time exiting the elevator even recited part of that familiar phrase from the Metro system: ‘前下’ or ‘disembarking comes first’.

On escalators the rule is observed somewhat more closely. On a Thursday afternoon at Jingtian station between noon and one o’clock, approximately 20 percent of people stood on the left even when there was ample space on the right.

When asked about this phenomenon, a station staff member surnamed Sun said people don’t pay attention to the rules during rush hour. He also said operators adjust the amount of time the doors stay open to accommodate for the amount of passengers using the train at any given time. “When there are more people trying to board the train, the doors stay open for longer,” Tan said.

In other words, there is no need to rush into the train because passengers are not in danger of being trapped in the door or left behind as long as they are in line by the time the train arrives and follow the proper procedures.

It is more difficult, however, for station managers to know whether a person inside a train who wants to get off is unable to reach the exit due to people entering first – hence the rule.

‘Let ‘em out!’

Some might assume this is just the way things work in large cities. However, according to people surveyed in New York City, London and Sydney, these rules are followed, and even enforced by the commuters themselves.

Lauren Kraft, an American who has been in Sydney for almost one year, said “almost everyone is awesome” at standing to the right on escalators and letting people moving quickly pass.

Maya Rudolph, who lives in Beijing but lived in New York City for six years, said people usually follow the rule ‘disembarking precedes embarking’, with people often heard yelling the catchphrase “Let ‘em out” when people don’t follow the rules. And although the NYC subway system doesn’t have a lot of escalators, “it’s generally understood that the right side is for standing and left is for passing,” she said.

Charlotte Linton, a longtime Shenzhen expatriate who lived in London for four years and grew up on its outskirts, said people follow the disembarking precedes embarking rule “pretty much always.” As far as the escalator rule, people “always” follow it because “many people in London are in a hurry and they will not take kindly to people blocking the left side of the escalators and slowing them down.” She could not recall a single situation in which people were trying to exit and enter a train simultaneously.

Shenzhen isn’t alone in regards to lack of respect for Metro etiquette; Moscow reportedly has some issues as well. People generally stand on the right and walk on the left of escalators, according to Kristina Bison, an American who lived in Moscow for several years. However, she said things can be a bit of a “free for all” when the doors open to the Metro there during rush hour.

During rush hour, “after a while you kind of forget all the manners and etiquette we were all taught as kids and you…push and shove until you get what you want,” she said. “If you don’t push and shove your way out when that happens, you will never be able to get off the train.”

With Metro workers lacking the authority to punish people for breaking the rules, the problem has become endemic.

“Sometimes people don’t listen to me. All we can do is advise them. We cannot stop them with force. People shouldn’t be in a rush to enter the subway. They should line up. A minority of people are not aware of this rule,” said Huang Zili, team leader of security guards at Grand Theatre Station.

As Shenzhen pushes to become an international city, its leaders might want to consider trying to enforce the small things that make for a more pleasant experience in the city.

Haohao

Shenzhen Supermarket Produce Covered in Unsafe Pesticides

Posted: 11/20/2014 12:11 pm

Shenzhen is no stranger to food scandals, and it appears another issue has cropped up that is giving buyers of fresh produce some concern.

A recent study by Ceda Farm Produce Test Center, which tests farm produce headed to Hong Kong, found that 11 percent of produce sampled from Shenzhen supermarkets and wet markets contained unsafe levels of pesticide residue.

The center conducted tests on 473 samples of meat and vegetables from 39 locations to obtain its results, which prompted lawmakers to call a hearing with representatives of the local food safety watchdog.

A local lawmaker named Huang Xiang said the government had previously been told that only 4 percent of the city’s produce had pesticide levels that were too high. He questioned why this discrepancy existed.

The representative from the city’s farm produce testing center, Wang Duojia, claimed that the test could have been skewed by a number of things. Lawmakers were not satisfied by this explanation and implored the city’s food safety watchdog to improve.

Haohao
AROUND THE WEB
Keep in Touch

What's happening this week in Shenzhen, Dongguan and Guangzhou? Sign up to be notified when we launch the This Week @ Nanfang newsletter.

sign up for our newsletter

Nanfang TV